The Sorry State of Things
Feb. 16th, 2006 11:07 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
katiefooleryHere's a quick quiz for you all. Tell me which of the following is correct:
Did you guess correctly? Are you aware that you have to use "are" with plurals and "is" with singular items? If so: congratulations! You're more intelligent than the new vice principal at my work.
Yesterday afternoon, we were treated that most pointless of creations: the work meeting. After a long and busy day, we all filed in to the staff lounge and prepared to be bored within an inch of our lives. Firstly, the principal read out information that had already been handily placed on a sheet of paper that we were all quite capable of reading ourselves. Perhaps he just wanted to make sure we were all still awake.
Then came the introductory speech of the new vice principal. She told us all about her adventures in working in the main office, the headquarters, if you will, of the Education Department. Or "at the region", as we call it in the trade. There she was, working on building curriculum and creating a well-educated state, without being able to properly conjugate one of the most basic verbs in the English language.
And let's not forget the fact she didn't know when to use "its" or "it's", as evidenced by her powerpoint display.
I sat there in the dark, grinding my teeth in annoyance and watching the education and literacy standards of today's youth disappear down a well of ignorance and illiteracy. What hope do the kids have when the people in high positions reveal themselves to be lacking in basic knowledge? It's all quite incredibly depressing.
What can be done about it? Personally, I think that the case is all but hopeless. A decision made by the education department in the seventies has ensured that nobody knows proper grammar any more. You see it on TV, in magazines on signs on windows - people don't know the basic concepts of stringing together letters and words in meaningful ways. In five years' time, I am willing to bet that nobody will believe me if I tell them that you don't use an apostrophe to indicate a plural.
Language is vital. Even more so now, with the majority of communication being carried out on the internet. You are judged by the words you use and the way in which you use them and to fail to give kids the tools with which to express themselves in a meaningful manner is one of the biggest crimes being committed in our country today. Why not just lock them all in small, dark rooms for the rest of their lives? We're taking away their ability to communicate and to express themselves and that is just not cricket.
In the past few years, I have befriended several people for whom English is not their first language and they have a better grasp of grammar than the average English speaker. They're taught respect for their language and how to construct and use it properly. No-one teaches respect for English. Some lucky people learn that for themselves. I, for one, love my language. I love its stupid rules and the way it's constantly breaking all of those rules. I love its versatility and the way it likes to create new words and new ways of using old words. I respect it and it's good to me in return.
The question is: how do we stop ourselves from producing generations of people who are unable to understand the very language they use to communicate? I'm only one person and I have no idea.
1. There's plenty of options...
- or -
2. There are plenty of options...
- or -
2. There are plenty of options...
Did you guess correctly? Are you aware that you have to use "are" with plurals and "is" with singular items? If so: congratulations! You're more intelligent than the new vice principal at my work.
Yesterday afternoon, we were treated that most pointless of creations: the work meeting. After a long and busy day, we all filed in to the staff lounge and prepared to be bored within an inch of our lives. Firstly, the principal read out information that had already been handily placed on a sheet of paper that we were all quite capable of reading ourselves. Perhaps he just wanted to make sure we were all still awake.
Then came the introductory speech of the new vice principal. She told us all about her adventures in working in the main office, the headquarters, if you will, of the Education Department. Or "at the region", as we call it in the trade. There she was, working on building curriculum and creating a well-educated state, without being able to properly conjugate one of the most basic verbs in the English language.
And let's not forget the fact she didn't know when to use "its" or "it's", as evidenced by her powerpoint display.
I sat there in the dark, grinding my teeth in annoyance and watching the education and literacy standards of today's youth disappear down a well of ignorance and illiteracy. What hope do the kids have when the people in high positions reveal themselves to be lacking in basic knowledge? It's all quite incredibly depressing.
What can be done about it? Personally, I think that the case is all but hopeless. A decision made by the education department in the seventies has ensured that nobody knows proper grammar any more. You see it on TV, in magazines on signs on windows - people don't know the basic concepts of stringing together letters and words in meaningful ways. In five years' time, I am willing to bet that nobody will believe me if I tell them that you don't use an apostrophe to indicate a plural.
Language is vital. Even more so now, with the majority of communication being carried out on the internet. You are judged by the words you use and the way in which you use them and to fail to give kids the tools with which to express themselves in a meaningful manner is one of the biggest crimes being committed in our country today. Why not just lock them all in small, dark rooms for the rest of their lives? We're taking away their ability to communicate and to express themselves and that is just not cricket.
In the past few years, I have befriended several people for whom English is not their first language and they have a better grasp of grammar than the average English speaker. They're taught respect for their language and how to construct and use it properly. No-one teaches respect for English. Some lucky people learn that for themselves. I, for one, love my language. I love its stupid rules and the way it's constantly breaking all of those rules. I love its versatility and the way it likes to create new words and new ways of using old words. I respect it and it's good to me in return.
The question is: how do we stop ourselves from producing generations of people who are unable to understand the very language they use to communicate? I'm only one person and I have no idea.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
on 2006-02-16 12:18 am (UTC)The only way I can see this sad state of affairs changing is to get more Grammar Nazis in English departments across the (English-speaking) world. My saving grace is that my favourite teacher is a Grammar Nazi, so all of the rules and such were pounded into my head.
I suppose that's not a very reasonable approach, though. I mean, I have no interest in going into teaching, and I know that bunches of the people I meet who know how grasp "the basic concepts of stringing together letters and words in meaningful ways" are in science fields.
On the one hand, that's really weird. On the other hand, those are the "type" of people I tend to hang out with, so it makes sense that the concentration is there.
I suppose, what I'm trying to say, is that the situation is deplorable, but I don't know what to do about it.
no subject
on 2006-02-16 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-02-16 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-02-16 05:46 am (UTC)The frustrating thing about the problem is that I can't understand why other people aren't seeing it and doing something about it. It makes me feel incredibly helpless.
no subject
on 2006-02-16 05:52 am (UTC)...I blame linguists.
I can not count the number of times the linguistics teacher ranted about how language is an ever-evolving thing, and thus people like us are wasting time.
So, for every person saying, "Hey doofus, apostrophes do NOT GO THERE" there's someone telling that person it's okay.
Have I ever mentioned how much I hated that theacher, that class, and almost everything I "learned" in it?
no subject
on 2006-02-16 05:56 am (UTC)I, too, hate it when people bring up the whole "language evolving" concept. Yes, it does evolve, but I'd like to think it doesn't do it through ignorance. Because that sounds like regressing, rather than evolving.