Correspondence
May. 30th, 2007 08:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear LJ,
Thanks for the good times, but I’m seriously considering saying goodbye to you. Yes, even with some seven or eight months left on my PAID ACCOUNT.
I have always felt safe here... right up until some no-name, non-government-supported, vigilante group tried to make it even “safer”. I don’t feel that sense of safety and homeliness any more. Now I feel as though I should watch what I say; that I should be looking over my shoulder nervously every time I write a post or a comment. I’ve even removed some of my interests out of paranoia.*
Oh, I added one, too: free speech.
I’m so sorry you felt pressured into doing what you’ve done and I’m sorry you made mistakes in doing that. I’m sorry that an organisation with an essentially admirable aim has potentially alienated some thirteen million people across the globe. I’m sorry that I just made a GJ account in case this all gets out of hand.
Communicate, LJ. Tell us what’s going on. Isn’t that what your
news account is for?
Yours in frustration,
Katie.
EDIT> Want to protest? Here are some suggestions. And if you currently have a Plus account, consider switching back to basic. Perhaps a loss of ad-generated revenue will make LJ and 6A sit up and take notice.
EDITx2> Finally, an explanation from
news... from the head of Six Apart. I guess we know for sure that LJ was not responsible now.
* And who wouldn’t be paranoid when there are rumours abounding that simply listing an interest in certain mangas is enough to get your journal deleted?
Thanks for the good times, but I’m seriously considering saying goodbye to you. Yes, even with some seven or eight months left on my PAID ACCOUNT.
I have always felt safe here... right up until some no-name, non-government-supported, vigilante group tried to make it even “safer”. I don’t feel that sense of safety and homeliness any more. Now I feel as though I should watch what I say; that I should be looking over my shoulder nervously every time I write a post or a comment. I’ve even removed some of my interests out of paranoia.*
Oh, I added one, too: free speech.
I’m so sorry you felt pressured into doing what you’ve done and I’m sorry you made mistakes in doing that. I’m sorry that an organisation with an essentially admirable aim has potentially alienated some thirteen million people across the globe. I’m sorry that I just made a GJ account in case this all gets out of hand.
Communicate, LJ. Tell us what’s going on. Isn’t that what your
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Yours in frustration,
Katie.
EDIT> Want to protest? Here are some suggestions. And if you currently have a Plus account, consider switching back to basic. Perhaps a loss of ad-generated revenue will make LJ and 6A sit up and take notice.
EDITx2> Finally, an explanation from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Click the banner for more info
(please be aware that this issue covers subjects such as child abuse -
don’t click the link if this is likely to upset or affect you)

(please be aware that this issue covers subjects such as child abuse -
don’t click the link if this is likely to upset or affect you)

* And who wouldn’t be paranoid when there are rumours abounding that simply listing an interest in certain mangas is enough to get your journal deleted?
no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:15 am (UTC)What happened? I must admit, I'm a bit behind on the times...
no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:35 am (UTC)WFI posted some rather graphic entry snippets from journals they see as disturbing. And they were and are disturbing. It kind of reminded me of when everyone was up in arms over Cho's writing after the VT incident. That his fiction (although really bad) was a sign that he needed psychological therapy. Yet, what strikes me is that people don't consider that some individuals (not all) write graphic fiction as a way of excising their own abuse. Take it from someone who's gone through something similar. So, what LJ is saying is that if I were to write an entry about what happened to me, and it was too graphic for show, that they would remove me from my blog? What's the point of the healing process then? So often people use writing and art as a key tool. If everyone victim were profiled simply for that and labeled as a psycho or pedophile, it would drive those individuals to never talk about the pain and just stuff away. Meanwhile, the real pervs are going elsewhere. What's the cost for catching the real bad people?
Anyway, I digress. Sorry for the TMI, but this sort of thing hits a nerve. I complete understand reporting individuals who are outright promoting their fantasies and experiences abusing others. It's the victims trying to tell their story that I worry about. It's a sad line between safety and our entitlement to free speech. How far are you willing to go to ensure it?
no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:52 am (UTC)So far, there's been a report that at least one community for survivors of child-abuse has been shut down... because they listed child-abuse as one of their interests. How is that helping to keep anyone safe? And as you say - how are people supposed to talk about their experiences if LJ is going to attack them for it? I suspect it's actually Six Apart that's behind these actions, but LJ's going to take the flack for it.
(I'm so sorry - I meant to put a warning above the link but I completely forgot. I'll fix that now.)
no subject
on 2007-05-30 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:22 am (UTC)And yes... I know we are
chattingranting about this right now :PThis just makes me so angry - and I wouldn't touch rapefic, incest or chan with a 10 foot pole - but I'll happily go to war to defend people the right to read and create it.
We'll go to greatest journal if we have to - despite the hideous purple :D
Oh and permanent account? *hollow laugh*
Not a chance, now.
Way to alienate 2/3 of your userbase LJ
no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:41 am (UTC)The important thing is that we can understand that people who write rapefic or incest or chan don't actually condone it or carry it out in real life.
I do feel sorry for WfI - they've made such an horrendous mistake. And if LJ doesn't do some serious damage control, they might well have to kiss goodbye to their stranglehold on fandom.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 11:49 am (UTC)And yes. It is a very good way to alienate 2/3 of their userbase. And while I don't believe moving will stop it from every happening, I am considering a move in protest of LJ's reaction to this silly WfI group.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-30 11:44 am (UTC)Their intentions are good, they're just appear to be going the wrong way about it. That's probably why I roll my eyes and snort in disgust when I see their name.
Anyway, time to keep catching up.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 12:09 pm (UTC)I do feel sorry for WfI - they have good intentions but they've missed their target completely.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 11:50 am (UTC)Holy... Crap...
What is WRONG with people? Seriously?
no subject
on 2007-05-30 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-30 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-30 09:40 pm (UTC)1. An organisation calling themselves "Warriors for Innocence" has taken it upon themselves to track down child-abusers on the internet. Which is a noble aim. However, they don't appear to be an official, or even legal, organisation.
2. They decided to go after LJ, on the basis that anyone who's a child abuser would list child abuse as an interest. LJ initially refused to act, saying that they couldn't find evidence that any of the people WfI was attacking had condoned or encouraged child abuse.
3. WfI persisted and (I'm assuming) went to Six Apart, LJ's parent company.
4. As of barely twenty-four hours ago, some five hundred journals and communities were deleted. Many of these were journals of role-playing characters or long-standing fanfic archives. At least one of the affected communities was a community offering support for sufferers of child abuse. Essentially, hundreds of innocent people have been attacked and had their journals deleted.
5. There have also been rumours that people with "dubious" icons (such as ones containing slash) have had their journals deleted.
The problem is that LJ (or Six Apart) has refused to make any statement about the issue, or confirm or deny anything.
no subject
on 2007-05-31 06:31 am (UTC)It seems odd to me that all this is happening, but nothing is being said about it from LJ's point. Why do this, and then not acknowledge it. Aside from your entry, I've seen or heard nothing about any of this, which strikes me as odd. Granted, I don't belong to any such communities, but you'd think it'd come up elsewhere, too?
And I agree, the sentiment of going after child abusers is a good one. But really... do they think that any child abuser is going to be stupid enough to flag himself like that? Isn't the whole point of what they do, to do so without raising flags to themselves? They usually are quite cunning and do everything surreptitiously. And yes, I do speak from the standpoint of an abusee.
I hope LJ comes to its senses, and that the people doing all of this get their heads straight again. What they want is noble. How they're going about it, is not. In fact, it could be construed as harrassment, as well as (I think this is the word for it, since it's written) liable.
Thanks for trying to explain it to me, Katie
no subject
on 2007-05-31 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-30 03:11 pm (UTC)I've been link-clicking for more than an hour, trying to fully understand this entire issue. I've suddenly realised wot a behemoth LJ really is. It's phenomenal!! No wonder it's all hit the fan. Everything's so confused that I can't even tell where the original rumour/problem even started.
Hopefully LJ will pull through alright.
And I've also suddenly discovered the real meaning of fandom, and to be honest, it kind of scares me...
no subject
on 2007-05-30 09:28 pm (UTC)I'm intrigued by your comment on fandom, though. What is it you've discovered and why does it scare you? (If you don't mind my asking.)
no subject
on 2007-05-30 03:25 pm (UTC)I have to say that WFI make me very uneasy. I spent some time reading their blog and I'm not entirely sure that they're dealing with child abuse in a helpful way. They seem to be more about scaremongering than anything else. Whilst I wholeheartedly support action against child abuse, I think it's important to make distinctions between people who are "grooming" and/or carrying out abuse and the people who have written a fanfic story about Harry Potter and Snape having sex.
I can see that LJ might have been influenced by WFI's "everyone is guilty" policy. Reading some of WFI's blog made me feel uneasy about my own interactions with children. One particular post warns against adults who:
"want to lure the child away by offering praise and compliments- “you’re beautiful, you should be in magazines or on television.”"
A few weeks ago I was in a supermarket and told a little girl that she looked very pretty. After reading WFI, I started feeling sleazy reading WFI, when all I'd wanted to do was to be nice to that kid. There's just something off about WFI.
As for the mass deletion of fanfic and fandom in general - I'm appalled. I'm sure there are real life child abusers on LJ, but all this action will have sent them underground. The majority of people who will pay for this are people involved in RP and fandom and that's just wrong. I think it's really sad that LJ has done this, especially when their earlier emails to WFI were straightforward and eloquent about their TOS and policies.
On a purely selfish level, I hope you don't leave. I would miss your posts. I would understand if you decided to though. This whole situation has made me look at LJ in a whole new light.
no subject
on 2007-05-31 07:22 am (UTC)Clearly, if they've made you feel like that about a simple compliment, then they're failing in their aim. They seem to be attacking everyone but the actual criminals.
I do believe that this is Six Apart's doing, not LJ's. As you said, LJ was resistant to act earlier on. I can only assume WfI went over their heads to Six Apart and that's when stuff started to happen. It's very sad. I don't want to leave LJ - I'd miss too many people - but I don't feel comfortable here any more.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 06:09 pm (UTC)I completely missed this whole thing, probably because I'm not involved in any fandoms right now.
Darth Vader also disapproves of you leaving. I am going to go and do more research on this issue after I eat something so that my brain will be functioning when I do.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 09:14 pm (UTC)I really don't want to leave - I would miss everyone horribly. When I posted this entry, I was just feeling really unsafe and I don't like feeling that way on LJ, especially not when it's always felt like my internet home.
I do hope LJ works something out here. There should have been a news post the minute this started and the lack thereof only makes them look guilty. The latest news post went from six pages of comments some eight hours ago... to forty when I just looked before. Thirty-four pages of people wanting to know what's going on and there's still no news.
no subject
on 2007-05-31 03:27 am (UTC)You know, I probably could have forgiven these deletions eventually, based on the fact that it's a TOS thing, and in the end, its their server. But WHY AREN'T THEY TALKING? Bloody hell!!
no subject
on 2007-05-31 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
on 2007-06-02 04:09 pm (UTC)Still, LJ needs to get something out there so that people know what's going on.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 09:52 pm (UTC)I don't like that feeling at all.
But I told you last night, you go, I go.
no subject
on 2007-05-31 07:29 am (UTC)I hope I don't have to go, but it's certainly nice to know I'll have plenty of company. :D
no subject
on 2007-05-30 10:16 pm (UTC)If you go, I'll probably go to.
so don't go :(
This whole thing sucks so much. :( :( :(.
no subject
on 2007-05-31 07:30 am (UTC)I don't want to go. :( I just feel so unsafe and uncomfortable now. And I kinda wish Six Apart would let LJ tell us what's going on.
no subject
on 2007-05-30 11:32 pm (UTC)I'm not saying that people shouldn't be up for scrutiny for what they write online - this is a public forum after all - but I do think there needs to be closer examination, communication between both parties, and certainly communication between LJ and their users. As a proud supporter of freedom of speech, this troubles me greatly.
no subject
on 2007-05-31 07:43 am (UTC)LJ, or Six Apart, is really doing themselves a disservice here. Answers have been demanded and none have been forthcoming.
no subject
on 2007-06-01 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
on 2007-05-31 12:55 am (UTC)Yes, I can see the original intended purpose but FFS! Why don't we go down to the library and burn some Enid Blyton books as well?? Who let this mob onto the premises anyway?
Will I get deleted because I have Spike/Lynda in my interests and their relationship is anything but functional??
no subject
on 2007-05-31 07:48 am (UTC)I believe Six Apart let them in. LJ was doing a fine job of defending its TOS until WfI went to Six Apart instead. Of course, that's just my theory - nobody actually knows anything for sure.
Citation as source for fandom linguistics paper?
on 2017-05-30 11:08 pm (UTC)I was wondering if it would be possible at all for me to cite you as a source in my paper for the OTW Journal on cultural and linguistic differences between Tumblr and Dreamwidth? Please let me know if you are willing, and if so, how you would like to be cited (your username or a different name).
Thanks,
Lily